Poll
Are 24-bit FLAC files a waste of storage for listeners who can’t hear the difference?
With streaming services defaulting to lossy formats and storage costs rising, the debate over 24-bit FLAC's necessity for average listeners is more relevant than ever. Cast your vote on whether high-resolution audio is a worthwhile investment or just digital clutter.
Options
Live results
Vote first to see results.
Emoji reactions
No reaction selected.
Comments
Please sign in to comment.
Share / embed
Quick info
- How do I vote in the "Are 24-bit FLAC files a waste of storage for listeners who can’t hear the difference?" poll?
- Select one option on the page to cast your vote; results update with community votes in real time.
- Can I view results without voting?
- Yes. Use the "I don't know / Show results" option, or access the results summary after voting.
Similar polls
Up to 10 suggestions from the same category and shared tags, sorted by vote count; this poll is excluded.
From the same category
Music, Podcasts and Audio ArtsThe same site category as this poll.
- How are indie musicians surviving the streaming economy now?
- Would you switch from live radio to AI-generated music curation for daily listening?
- Is a $3000 headphone setup really worth it for the average audiophile?
- Why do audiophiles hate Bluetooth when most of us can't hear the difference anyway?
- Would you switch from wired headphones to Bluetooth if latency issues were finally gone?
- Does anyone else feel like podcasts are way too loud compared to music?
- Do you actually enjoy live podcasts, or do you just go for the Instagram photo?
- Which podcast app actually nails music discovery and not just chat shows?
- Does anyone else feel like most music streaming services are just burning a hole in your pocket?
- Does your vinyl habit still make sense with skyrocketing record prices?
TrendVersus.com · live data