Poll
Should we still make things that are built to break, or is planned obsolescence the only way to keep the economy running?
As 2026 brings tighter sustainability regulations and rising consumer backlash against wasteful products, the tension between economic growth and environmental responsibility has never been sharper. Cast your vote on whether planned obsolescence is a necessary evil or a relic we can finally abandon.
Options
Live results
Vote first to see results.
Emoji reactions
No reaction selected.
Comments
Please sign in to comment.
Share / embed
Quick info
- How do I vote in the "Should we still make things that are built to break, or is planned obsolescence the only way to keep the economy running?" poll?
- Select one option on the page to cast your vote; results update with community votes in real time.
- Can I view results without voting?
- Yes. Use the "I don't know / Show results" option, or access the results summary after voting.
Similar polls
Up to 10 suggestions from the same category and shared tags, sorted by vote count; this poll is excluded.
From the same category
Industrial Production and EngineeringThe same site category as this poll.
- CNC machining vs 3D printing for metal prototypes — which handles tighter tolerances?
- What's the best industrial production engineering software that won't break the bank?
- Do you check the country of origin when buying industrial goods?
- How do you vet a contract manufacturer for complex, low-volume engineering runs?
- Should engineering schools stop teaching traditional manufacturing methods and focus entirely on AI and 3D printing?
- Can mass production ever be truly eco-friendly now?
- Are factory jobs safer with AI taking over heavy lifting?
- Is "Made in China" engineering still a stereotype or a genuine quality gamble worth taking?
- Is your engineering team struggling with rising raw material costs?
- Should I buy cnc machines or outsource parts
TrendVersus.com · live data